Expert evidence plays a crucial role in many NCAT matters — from building disputes and strata issues to guardianship, consumer claims, and administrative reviews. NCAT relies on experts to help it understand technical, specialised, or scientific issues that fall outside ordinary knowledge. This guide explains what expert evidence is, when it’s needed, and how NCAT expects it to be presented.
Expert evidence is any opinion or explanation provided by someone with specialised knowledge based on training, study, or experience. In NCAT, expert evidence commonly appears in:
Building defect reports
Engineering assessments
Medical or psychological opinions
Financial or accounting reports
Valuations
Strata and property inspections
Technical assessments (IT, safety, compliance, etc.)
NCAT accepts expert evidence only when it helps resolve a factual or technical issue.
Expert evidence is typically needed when:
The dispute involves technical matters (e.g., structural defects, waterproofing, electrical issues)
A party relies on specialised knowledge to prove a claim
The Tribunal cannot make findings without expert input
The law requires expert opinion (e.g., medical evidence in guardianship matters)
In building matters, NCAT almost always expects independent expert reports, not quotes or contractor opinions.
NCAT follows Procedural Direction 3 – Expert Evidence, which sets out strict requirements for expert reports. Experts must:
Understand their duty to NCAT
Provide independent, unbiased opinions
Clearly state their qualifications
Identify the questions they were asked to address
Set out assumptions, facts, and documents relied upon
Explain their reasoning and methodology
Acknowledge any limitations in their opinion
Sign the required NCAT Expert Witness Code of Conduct declaration
Failure to comply can result in the evidence being given little weight — or excluded entirely.
NCAT places strong emphasis on independence. Experts must:
Avoid advocacy
Avoid taking sides
Use neutral, factual language
Disclose any conflicts of interest
Provide opinions based on accepted principles or standards
Reports that read like submissions or arguments are often rejected.
NCAT expects expert reports to be:
Logical sections
Plain English
Clear answers to each question
All assumptions listed
All documents and tests identified
Limitations openly acknowledged
Opinions supported by data, standards, or testing
Reasoning explained step‑by‑step
Includes the NCAT Code of Conduct declaration
Follows Procedural Direction 3
In some matters, NCAT may direct experts to:
Confer
Identify areas of agreement and disagreement
Produce a joint report
Narrow issues before the hearing
Experts must approach conferences cooperatively and independently — not as advocates for the party who engaged them.
Experts may be required to attend the hearing to:
Explain their report
Answer questions from the Tribunal
Respond to cross‑examination
Clarify assumptions or methodology
NCAT expects experts to remain calm, factual, and impartial throughout.
Reports written by contractors rather than qualified experts
Unsupported conclusions (“in my opinion…”) without reasoning
Failure to comply with the Code of Conduct
Advocacy or argumentative tone
Lack of testing or inadequate investigation
Opinions outside the expert’s field
Reports that do not address the actual questions in dispute
These issues significantly reduce the weight NCAT gives to the evidence.
[ ] Expert is qualified in the relevant field
[ ] Report complies with Procedural Direction 3
[ ] Code of Conduct declaration included
[ ] Issues and questions clearly identified
[ ] Assumptions and documents listed
[ ] Reasoning and methodology explained
[ ] Opinions supported by evidence
[ ] Limitations disclosed
[ ] Neutral, independent tone
[ ] Expert available for hearing if required
Witness.net.au connects you with independent, qualified experts across NSW who understand NCAT’s requirements and produce compliant, persuasive reports.
